As Venezuela and Bolivia are making policies that favor companies, these, through the actions they have in the media are engaged in discrediting these countries. Beginning with Bolivia
make the world a story. The phrase that eating chicken causes homosexuality, made by Evo, was highly publicized by the media, branding Evo ignorant and homophobic. However, take the sentence in context, referred to as transgenic chickens, which is scientifically proven to cause changes in hormones. The message was not anti-gay but against GMOs, but of course, if they take the phrase in context and maximize the people form a negative opinion of the president of Bolivia, which is what matters to businesses, create pressure and prestige to get it falls.
Another example was when a football match, Evo was chopped with an opponent and he dropped a knee to the Bone ...
Of course all it means maximized. Instead, I saw the other day that Alan Garcia, Peru's president slapped for calling someone corrupt. And it was the 3 rd time you slap someone who criticized him. That however did not hear about in the mass media. That is, a story about a football match is maximized to ridicule the president because he does not sit well with businesses. However, a slap because criticism is muted. Should be more worrying that a slap someone for a review, to be a knee someone in a trance in a football game. But not, because companies do not care.
recently, Bolivia forward the retirement age from 65 to 58 years. Apart from that in Bolivia the people live under, is a very important social advance. Of course, the mass media did not report any of this. Prefer to report on simple anecdotes like chickens or the knee, to report on policies that really affect people. Because companies are interested discredit and silence what it does well.
's the same with Venezuela. That if ETA, if the FARC, that if the Venezuelan electoral system ... They criticize the electoral system as in Spain or the USA are a lot worse. But change in the election, no media rails against the electoral system in these countries, and called that country's undemocratic for it. Why? For business as usual. Because companies are happy in those countries and do not want to talk about what is wrong. Instead as they are not happy in Venezuela, his critics to death, and highly hypocritical to defend in other countries.
turns out that if there are ETA terrorists who have been trained in France, no one thinks that Sarkozy and his government support ETA or have links with it. However if it is in Venezuela, the Chavez government and are linked to ETA, of course. Another example of how the mass media distort to bring down a government that does not sit well at all.
talk all the time of violent deaths in Venezuela, which is very worrying, but not talk about poverty reduction or eradication of illiteracy. Because they are not interested. Look only at the problems you have and out of the way the good things they have done, as if the government does not do anything good, as if I did everything wrong and was the worst in the world.
I do not defend everything they do Chavez and Morales. There are things I do not like (like to support China or Venezuela in the case of nuclear energy). But it is the less. You can report it in an objective, but the media talk about the problems of these countries, silence the good things they have done, and maximize the stories or controversies that may have to give a negative image of the country.
This a very good solution, as is being done in Ecuador, is a law that forbids banks to own shares in the media.
could also be attempts by governments to grant more licenses to radio, TV or newspaper to more different ideological spaces, that would have greater disparity of opinions, not so influenced by big business with very marked interest in different countries . 
0 comments:
Post a Comment