Wrestling Shoes Rulon Gardner

Riots in Libya and Gaddafi's relationship with the left

happening many are being protests in the Arab world after the fall of Tunisia and Egypt. In Algeria began to protest when Tunisia had not yet fallen and continue, despite a huge police presence orchestrating.

In Morocco also is deploying the police and army to repress the timid, for the moment, there are protests.
in Iran and Syria have also been protests a few days, but they seem to have continuity. The most symbolic
have been Mauritania and Saudi Arabia. I get to be the last to fall.
protests in Jordan was on par with Egypt, but now not hear them much.
Who else can hear is Yemen, which began to protest with Egitpo and still.

These countries have joined 2 new that had not been heard before, Bahrain and Libya, and 2 with great brutality.

x381-L.jpg" imageanchor="1" style="margin-left: 1em; margin-right: 1em;">

are brutally suppressed. Hopefully protesters achieve their goals, but unfortunately it seems that neither the king of Bahrain and Gaddafi will walk punches.

Gaddafi has always been a controversial figure. It takes more than 40 years in power. In the beginning was a socialist revolution, nationalist but the time has degenerated into corruption, luxury, ostentation, repression ...
wherever he goes riding his tent, regardless of the suffering of his people.
was involved in a terrorist attack on a plane in 1988 that killed 259 people falling on a Scottish city.

was subsequently vetoed by the UN to which he gave to those responsible. One of them was released in 2009 for health reasons, and Libya received him as a hero.

takes bad with the U.S.. In 1986, Reagan attacked Libya with missiles.

The title of this post is "Riots in Libya and relationship de Gadafi con la izquierda". Hace tiempo que quería hablar sobre Gadafi y su relación con la izquierda, y ahora que se están dando las revueltas he encontrado el momento. ,
En 2009 Chávez elogió a Gadafi, comparándolo con Simón Bolívar, y lo condecoró con la orden y el collar del Libertador. También le regaló una replica de una espada que perteneció a Bolívar.

"No estoy exagerando para nada, lo que es Simón Bolívar para nosotros... es Moamar Gadafi para el pueblo libio, es el Libertador de Libia", dijo Chávez.
"Es un gran honor que he recibido", dijo Gadafi por medio de un interprete, y en respuesta le obsequió una montura completa inlaid with silver was used by Libyan soldiers.

has also had good relations with Cuba, Raul and Fidel Castro.
The same applies to Iran. During a visit by Ahmadinejad to Venezuela, Chavez said:
"You're a gladiator anti-imperialist struggles, such as firmness, steadfastness for the freedom of your people, by the greatness of the Persian nation, the Iranian nation, the homeland of Bolivar welcome you.
Also, on the anniversary of the Iranian revolution, Chavez compared with the Bolivarian movement.

schemes have also defended corrupt, in which there is no freedom of expression and in which government leaders live well when people live very badly, such as China or North Korea.
In the 60 th anniversary of China's revolution, Chavez sent a congratulation to Hu Jintao saying
"To celebrate this heroic victory is popular to say that the Chinese people have stood up. Buddy, boundless admiration awakened in me this glorious date that encourages world revolutions.
Are we friends. China has with us, we walked towards socialism. Have you on the Bolivarian people not just feverish fans, but soldiers of a revolution sister and friend of all revolutions.
China presents socialism as a way possible and necessary for the emancipation of our people, at a time when there is also unrest against the unfinished task of seeing people freed of all America.
I am more than convinced that this is the time to unite our nations' efforts to strengthen the social justice model that gives encouragement to live our daily actions.



Cuba also has important ties with China and PCE.

And that China is far from being a communist. A country in which employees work 16 hours a day collecting lousy pay, sleeping in the same factory and with little holiday as well as there is no freedom of expression, and there is enormous corruption and censorship can not be called socialist.
Not to mention the death penalty prevailing in these countries, or wrongful imprisonment.
police or the army brutally suppressed the demonstrations, as in Libya or Iran. Remember the slaughter of Tiannamen.

And do not talk about Tibet and Xian such protests, but protests of citizens, workers, students, who are demanding better working conditions and greater political openness.

respect to North Korea there are positions more orthodox in the PCE also support the Stalinist regime.

believe this is a strategic error of monumental left. However anti-imperialist and anti-American to be Ahmadinejad Qaddafi or, what is clear is that they are oppressors, do not allow freedom of expression or political parties, censored, and especially in the case of Qaddafi, are corrupt and live very well when it passes its people badly. And that should be much more important than the fact that they are anti-imperialist or anti-American.

So hopefully Venezuela, Cuba, and in general left to reconsider their views on Libya, China and Iran condemn the repression committed by these countries, and support the just demands of the demonstrators of true democracy, freedom of expression, freedom from repression, censorship and corruption.

Brown University Interview Clothing

The greatest betrayal in history

Finally I give my opinion on the pension agreement signed by employers, government and unions. tiempor've been waiting so to see what was on the Confederation Council of Labor Committees, the reactions of IU and the PCE and the discussions in the forum

iu, which I recommend that you go sometime.
I have read many articles in I LOVE UI on the pact, some very good. Others put songs like "Working Class Hero" of Lendakaris Dead. I have come to mind 2 songs. One of the legendary Eskorbuto, the "It's a crime." Specifically states:
The party that governs this country
and his entire parliamentary opposition.
The employers, unions,
all contribute to our failure.

is a crime,
is a crime.
is a crime,
is a crime.

From Potron
promised solution to all problems of this nation.
Unemployment, poverty, humiliation, is what we got,
only chance may trigger a reaction.

is a crime,
is a crime, both lead
malgastao,
is a crime, in bodies
unnecessary
is a crime, both lead
malgastao,
is a crime, in bodies
unnecessary
is a crime.


The other song is Oskar kon k, an anarchist songwriter, very appropriate for the occasion. At the end they will be right and all the anarchists.

I put the song "libertarian" who speaks on the subject:
As a labor union can negotiate with the government,
when they are the ones who are going to explode.
As a labor union can negotiate with the government,
when it is assumed that he must fight against.

We are workers, are the people,
our enemies are the state and government.
We must not agree with those who exploit us
is stupid and detrimental to our future as free people.
We do not want to give us and then take away,
we do not want to smile back and manipulate us.
pact with them would be lost to the struggle.
freedom is achieved pulse to pulse and defeat after defeat, and that
so we have no reason to sympathize with them,
and so can always be their enemies, and have reasons and to justify
that anarchy is possible, and that through self-management and mutual support,
can build a more just and egalitarian society, without pluses and no less,
but equal, long live the punk alive revolutionary struggle.

Join us, the union is strength,
fight against them is not beside them.
Join us, the union is strength,
fight against them is not beside them.

I put a post earlier
social dialogue on 14 January when had not yet been agreed. Picture 3 possible scenarios:
On 1 was that it came to retirement at age 67 and had confrontation.
The 2 nd that the unions managed to push back retirement at age 67 through dialogue. The 3, which has happened, to swallow 67. At this point specifically said this:
and unions is give talks on the proposal of 67 years saying that waged by people with more years of contributions and who have managed to smooth things labor reform.

As I said before I do not see the unions giving in to that, but with dialogue so who knows. I think this scenario would be worse, would the total discrediting of unions.
Although who knows, maybe that push towards alternative Unions rose and occupy their space.

I focused fully on the 1 st sentence. The last two are for see. What I do is contributing to the rejection of the left main unions. Has contributed to strengthening the leftist thesis against major trade unions.

I will not get to criticize the government or employers, or to criticize the agreement, because that makes the whole world.
I'm going to criticize the unions, and also to IU and the PCE.

can not be that IU and the PCE continue on as before, criticizing the government and the employer but not a word of criticism of the unions. They can not have the same speech on January 26 that on 13 February. On January 26, criticized the Government and the employers and said that pension reform was not necessary. A February 13 still saying the same thing. As if nothing had happened. One who did not know what happened between January 26 and February 13, reads the declarations of these two days and believes that everything remains the same and that the unions have not agreed.
But no, they agreed. And so IU and the PCE should criticize.
not going to have a complete break with UGT and CCOO. I've always said, if my work UGT was the most militant union I joined him head even though I did not like its overall policy, because it would be best placed defend my rights in my surroundings.
Therefore, above all, absolute respect for UGT and CCOO where there are combative, and peers that they are active.
But one thing does not remove the other. It can be military or CCOO UGT in a sector where they are combative, and at the same time criticizing the agreement they have reached their addresses. It's the least they should do IU and PCE.
I'm not saying you have to break completely with them, but unless a statement stating:
"We disagree with the position taken by the leadership of the CCOO and UGT in the covenant. We believe they made a mistake by signing and many of its rank and file disagree with is signed. "
That would not break them outright. Immediately afterwards, one could add:
"The PCE and IU will continue work and dialogue with the CCOO and UGT from mutual respect to find common ground and work together. That does not mean that if there is any point where we disagree, stating ".
One thing very simple. It seems that there is much fear of breaking with the CCOO and UGT, because they are the 2 main trade unions that bring together the highest number of workers . So I do not think you have to send them. But unless a critical public.
check

Once critical to IU and the PCE, he takes issue with the unions. In their respective councils, only 10 % of UGT and CCOO 10% opposed the deal. However, it seems that that vote of the address does not correspond at all with his base, because Most people reject the pact, and many fellow CCOO and UGT base as well.
Then there is a clear alternative. Try that grassroots discontent is reflected in the address. For this critical sector of the CCOO and the PCE should be involved to the fullest, trying to get to the real feel of the unions. However

is a complicated task, and we must be prepared for the possibility of losing forever CCOO and UGT. If it proves impossible to change the addresses of the CCOO and UGT have to think seriously about Plan B.
And for me that plan B goes through minority unions. These
aware of their social minority, should consider joining on a broad front, each retaining its ideology and its scope.

This front should be driven by the critical sector of CCOO and PCE that an inability to change the direction of trade unions, would switch to another strategy. It should invite all minority unions (CGT, CNT, USE, Solidaridad Obrera, SOC, SAT, CUT, ELA, LAB, COS, CIG, Cobas, CSIF, HIRU, COAG, STEES ...) to form the front. Surely not everyone wanted to join him, but at least they would be invited, and who have higher propensity to agree, would be based on front.
is the only alternative I see, establish a trade union front. Why spend all to a minority union, was CGT, CNT, or USO, would scatter forces at a time which would have to unite to address the CCOO and UGT pact.


short. IU and the PCE should criticize the position of trade unions and set to work to recover. If you do not succeed, must get to work immediately to achieve a viable union alternative. Because the agreement signed
has been the biggest betrayal in history, and will be remembered for many years among people, thus leading to non-members and their rejection of the unions, and therefore to the hegemony of the discourse of right that unions are some sold, some vague that they do not work, they receive state subsidies and have released. What

served the general strike on September 29? Many people were fired for striking, myself and another comrade are waiting for a record by putting up posters in favor of the strike. There was much work to convince them that the strike was necessary, many bites, a lot of movement, lots of energy. All this, why? Why we end up selling? Normal people are raised to strike, if you are not going to help anything because the unions are going to sell. and address this situation and deal with that speech there, or that seek to recover the CCOO and UGT, either launch an alternative union strong and viable to compete against CCOO and UGT. It is a matter of vital importance, because the economic and labor is 1 st magnitude and deserves our attention and all our efforts. Lately

How To Get Infinite Money In Emerald

On languages \u200b\u200bin the Senate

Noma Programmable Thermostat Directions

With protests taking place in Egypt, the media said they feared that Islamic fundamentalism came to power, or to give as the Iranian revolution in Saudi Arabia. The

1 that shows is that they seem to prefer a corrupt dictatorship, pro-imperialist to a corrupt dictatorship and anti-imperialist. Because at the end of the government of Saudi Arabia is as restrictive or more as Iran, so little mind to be transformed into a regime like Iran, the situation will continue like that.

Anyway, it seems that there is only Islamic fundamentalism and moderate Islam, when I think there are at least 4 political branches.

One, indeed, be more radical fundamentalism, see Al Qaeda, the Taliban or the Islamic Courts of Somalia.

In a step below would put the conservative Islam, represented by Saudi Arabia (women are forbidden to drive), Sudan (a woman condemned to 40 lashes for wearing trousers), and Iran (stoning, female circumcision. ..). They are not as radical as on 1 group but still are very restrictive and especially with women. After

would put Hamas in Palestine, Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt and Jordan. The press is determined to put them in the 2nd group, but not so restrictive as to women. They also have a very important social factor, have schools and soup kitchens for children, provide jobs, cheap commodities, and help people, which makes them much support.
You tend to have a lack of corruption.

Then and moderate Islam would be more or less democratic as Al Fatah, Turkey or Morocco. It is more like what the Western media, are moderate and more open to dialogue, but not the population, who are seen as supporters of U.S. and they are corrupt.

So I think that there are different political branches in Islam and that not everything is black or businesses, and we must be to each specific situation. Indeed the Muslim Brothers have given their support to the Baredei, so nobody thinks that they are going to be a dictatorial rule as Iran, because it will not be. Will be more like Hamas or Hezbollah, which incidentally are govern through democratic elections, which do moderate Islamic governments such as Morocco, or conservatives and pro-imperialist such as Saudi Arabia.